NOTICE: The Drug Law Center is no longer accepting these type of cases. This page is strictly for informational purposes. We appreciate your cooperation and understanding by not contacting our office on these cases. We are actively investigating and prosecuting cases involving Valsartan cancers. For information on Valsartan lawsuits, look here.
The retention of a lawyer is a personal decision that may be dependent upon a variety of factors including your personal circumstance. The reality is that from the moment that a defect was acknowledged with the Stryker products, the interests of the company and those of the individuals with the defective hip prosthetics are adverse due to the fact that the company has an interest in paying out as little as possible to resolve the case for each individual.
Additionally, Stryker like most medical device companies involved in a product recall, benefit very much from a position of power when it comes to negotiating claims directly with individuals. Behind the scenes of each case lies a team of attorneys, medical technicians and other professionals who are focused on resolving each claim as quickly as inexpensively as feasible.
When an individual secures an attorney to represent them in their case, they benefit from both the advocacy and experience that comes along with metal-on-metal hip defect litigation can only bring. Our attorneys have experience litigating hundreds of metal-on-metal hip recall cases on behalf of individuals across the country. We know the techniques of how many of these manufacturers evaluate cases and take the necessary steps to maximize the real value of your case. Our contingency fee system ensures that our interests are completely aligned with those of each client as we only charge a fee when there is a recovery for you.
Put our experience to work for you. We invite you to talk with a Stryker Rejuvenate lawyer without cost or obligation to discuss your legal options related to your Stryker product.